<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kierkegaard or a Cold Shower?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelig Tjokrosantoso</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zelig Tjokrosantoso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-1830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kent - thx for the info. I&#039;ve already downloaded the pdf version of it. Have to read it now ... thx once again]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kent &#8211; thx for the info. I&#8217;ve already downloaded the pdf version of it. Have to read it now &#8230; thx once again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-1777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zelig - Thanks for stopping in. I don&#039;t have any good suggestions for internet sites on Kierkegaard beyond the link provided in the post itself. Maybe start there and see where it takes you. 

Another great resource is an Moore, &quot;Provocations: Spiritual Writings of Kierkegaard&quot; (Plough Publishing, 1999).

Cheers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zelig &#8211; Thanks for stopping in. I don&#8217;t have any good suggestions for internet sites on Kierkegaard beyond the link provided in the post itself. Maybe start there and see where it takes you. </p>
<p>Another great resource is an Moore, &#8220;Provocations: Spiritual Writings of Kierkegaard&#8221; (Plough Publishing, 1999).</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelig Tjokrosantoso</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zelig Tjokrosantoso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-1776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all, I just started reading &quot;Kierkegaard for Beginners&quot; and I&#039;ve found it very interesting, especially his critical thought over the story of Abraham and Isaac (not his father&#039;s penitent version anyway ...). I think we at least have to appreciate his works despite his eccentricity and his &quot;one sided-ness&quot;.

Can anyone give me another link about Kierkegaard?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, I just started reading &#8220;Kierkegaard for Beginners&#8221; and I&#8217;ve found it very interesting, especially his critical thought over the story of Abraham and Isaac (not his father&#8217;s penitent version anyway &#8230;). I think we at least have to appreciate his works despite his eccentricity and his &#8220;one sided-ness&#8221;.</p>
<p>Can anyone give me another link about Kierkegaard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-1307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;things I&#8217;ve found myself reading...&lt;/strong&gt;

Had such a good time linking great posts, thought I&#8217;d do it again!
theologyforum and Kierkegaard: 
Woe to him therefore, who preaches Christianity without the possibility of offense. Woe to the person who smoothly, flirtatiously, commendingly, co...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>things I&#8217;ve found myself reading&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Had such a good time linking great posts, thought I&#8217;d do it again!<br />
theologyforum and Kierkegaard:<br />
Woe to him therefore, who preaches Christianity without the possibility of offense. Woe to the person who smoothly, flirtatiously, commendingly, co&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Resler</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Resler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, keeping the two straight is helpful.  Thanks Kent, your dialogue is indeed helpful and I can see Kierkegaard and others who rail against an &quot;apologetics of domestication&quot; as challenging enough for me.  Admittingly, I find myself here more than in the &quot;apologetics of contextualization&quot; - much to my shame.  Praise God for a God who is bigger than our &quot;domestications&quot; and continually sends His Spirit to &quot;contextualize&quot; our lives for His gospel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, keeping the two straight is helpful.  Thanks Kent, your dialogue is indeed helpful and I can see Kierkegaard and others who rail against an &#8220;apologetics of domestication&#8221; as challenging enough for me.  Admittingly, I find myself here more than in the &#8220;apologetics of contextualization&#8221; &#8211; much to my shame.  Praise God for a God who is bigger than our &#8220;domestications&#8221; and continually sends His Spirit to &#8220;contextualize&#8221; our lives for His gospel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Derek, Hmmm. I wonder if we might distinguish between &quot;apologetics of contextualization&quot; and &quot;apologetics of domestication&quot;, the later being the kind that Kierkegaard rightly despairages. 

It seems &quot;making the gospel more tangible&quot;, as you said, would fall into the former category and fulfill our responsibility to witness to the Gospel in changing cultures.

Keeping the two straight would seem to be the trick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek, Hmmm. I wonder if we might distinguish between &#8220;apologetics of contextualization&#8221; and &#8220;apologetics of domestication&#8221;, the later being the kind that Kierkegaard rightly despairages. </p>
<p>It seems &#8220;making the gospel more tangible&#8221;, as you said, would fall into the former category and fulfill our responsibility to witness to the Gospel in changing cultures.</p>
<p>Keeping the two straight would seem to be the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Resler</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Resler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Kent for the post.  I track with the heart of his message.  The gospel by and large calls us to live a life that is antithetical to the world.  By that definition, the Christian life and message does give offense.  However, I would challenge the &quot;woe&quot; as far as making the faith more &quot;reasonable.&quot;  Where does apologetic fit in?  Where does biblical movements such as intelligent Design fit in - and for that matter, the new Ben Stein movie Expelled?  

There should be a place for making the gospel more tangible but at the same time staying true to the dictates and demands of the Spirit in making us a Holy nation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kent for the post.  I track with the heart of his message.  The gospel by and large calls us to live a life that is antithetical to the world.  By that definition, the Christian life and message does give offense.  However, I would challenge the &#8220;woe&#8221; as far as making the faith more &#8220;reasonable.&#8221;  Where does apologetic fit in?  Where does biblical movements such as intelligent Design fit in &#8211; and for that matter, the new Ben Stein movie Expelled?  </p>
<p>There should be a place for making the gospel more tangible but at the same time staying true to the dictates and demands of the Spirit in making us a Holy nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James, thanks for connecting the dots for us between Kierkegaard and Barth.  

On the relationship between Barth and Kierkegaard, see Phil Ziegler, &quot;Barth&#039;s Criticisms of Kierkegaard – A Striking out at Phantoms?&quot; in the International Journal of Systematic Theology, Vol. 9, Issue 4, pp. 434-451.

Ziegler concludes, &quot;[I]f we could espy the two theologians together at rest in that eschatological congregation Kierkegaard himself imagined, we might see on Barth’s visage that same ‘painful grin’ that crossed his face when he discovered in 1925 that someone had written a book length study of himself and Kierkegaard. In that pained grin, I think we might still recognize Barth’s grateful ambivalence towards his Danish tutor, perhaps made slightly less painful by the kinds of considerations reviewed in this article. Do we have any reason to doubt that the Dane might be sporting the same mixed expression ready with questions and criticisms of his own for his Swiss student?&quot; (451)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, thanks for connecting the dots for us between Kierkegaard and Barth.  </p>
<p>On the relationship between Barth and Kierkegaard, see Phil Ziegler, &#8220;Barth&#8217;s Criticisms of Kierkegaard – A Striking out at Phantoms?&#8221; in the International Journal of Systematic Theology, Vol. 9, Issue 4, pp. 434-451.</p>
<p>Ziegler concludes, &#8220;[I]f we could espy the two theologians together at rest in that eschatological congregation Kierkegaard himself imagined, we might see on Barth’s visage that same ‘painful grin’ that crossed his face when he discovered in 1925 that someone had written a book length study of himself and Kierkegaard. In that pained grin, I think we might still recognize Barth’s grateful ambivalence towards his Danish tutor, perhaps made slightly less painful by the kinds of considerations reviewed in this article. Do we have any reason to doubt that the Dane might be sporting the same mixed expression ready with questions and criticisms of his own for his Swiss student?&#8221; (451)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken buck</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken buck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I need that...  thanks  (Kierkegaard was my personal rescue in my college years...  it is good to hear from him again.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need that&#8230;  thanks  (Kierkegaard was my personal rescue in my college years&#8230;  it is good to hear from him again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/kierkegaard-or-a-cold-shower/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Earl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reaction: ouch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reaction: ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
