<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Bentley Hart on Trinitarian Being</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/david-bentley-hart-on-trinitarian-being/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/david-bentley-hart-on-trinitarian-being/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beau</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/david-bentley-hart-on-trinitarian-being/#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=497#comment-2037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m slightly frustrated by not being able to see the larger context of the quote in James&#039;s section. (Come on Merrick! Push &quot;fair use&quot; to the limit! Type in the whole chapter!) 

Regardless, I can&#039;t determine what precisely is &quot;analogical&quot; about an &quot;infinite&quot; &quot;interval&quot; Is it even possible to &quot;analogize&quot; two things without some larger general category from which to draw shared characteristics or whatever? Somebody&#039;s going to have to enlighten me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m slightly frustrated by not being able to see the larger context of the quote in James&#8217;s section. (Come on Merrick! Push &#8220;fair use&#8221; to the limit! Type in the whole chapter!) </p>
<p>Regardless, I can&#8217;t determine what precisely is &#8220;analogical&#8221; about an &#8220;infinite&#8221; &#8220;interval&#8221; Is it even possible to &#8220;analogize&#8221; two things without some larger general category from which to draw shared characteristics or whatever? Somebody&#8217;s going to have to enlighten me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
