<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aquinas, Preaching, and the Christian Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/aquinas-preaching-and-the-christian-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/aquinas-preaching-and-the-christian-life/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/aquinas-preaching-and-the-christian-life/#comment-4330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=1124#comment-4330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken, I make no claims at being an adept reader of Aquinas and much less someone familiar with McIntyre&#039;s Thomism. As I finish reading the book I will stay alert for interactions with McIntyre.

Do you have any suggestions for reading on this topic - for me and others who may be interested in following up on this, particularly McIntyre&#039;s Thomism? Until recently I had not known that McIntyre was a Thomist.

Thanks Ken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, I make no claims at being an adept reader of Aquinas and much less someone familiar with McIntyre&#8217;s Thomism. As I finish reading the book I will stay alert for interactions with McIntyre.</p>
<p>Do you have any suggestions for reading on this topic &#8211; for me and others who may be interested in following up on this, particularly McIntyre&#8217;s Thomism? Until recently I had not known that McIntyre was a Thomist.</p>
<p>Thanks Ken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken oakes</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/aquinas-preaching-and-the-christian-life/#comment-4321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken oakes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=1124#comment-4321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it would be interesting to know how Healy would address the claims of Alasdair MacIntyre regarding Thomas&#039; &#039;system,&#039; meaning the purpose of the disputation format of the ST. I think that MacIntyre would agree that the disputation format is inherently an &#039;anti-system system,&#039; as progress is supposed to be built into the whole thing, but this format certainly works, at least for MacIntyre, at &#039;conquering&#039; other systems through dialectical argumentation. I am not sure if MacIntyre is completely correct in his reading of Aquinas, but this position represents one that diverges (at points) from Healy&#039;s account.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would be interesting to know how Healy would address the claims of Alasdair MacIntyre regarding Thomas&#8217; &#8216;system,&#8217; meaning the purpose of the disputation format of the ST. I think that MacIntyre would agree that the disputation format is inherently an &#8216;anti-system system,&#8217; as progress is supposed to be built into the whole thing, but this format certainly works, at least for MacIntyre, at &#8216;conquering&#8217; other systems through dialectical argumentation. I am not sure if MacIntyre is completely correct in his reading of Aquinas, but this position represents one that diverges (at points) from Healy&#8217;s account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-11-21 &#124; The 'K' is not silent</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/aquinas-preaching-and-the-christian-life/#comment-4259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2008-11-21 &#124; The 'K' is not silent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=1124#comment-4259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Aquinas, Preaching, and the Christian Life (tags: article history theology hermeneutics) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aquinas, Preaching, and the Christian Life (tags: article history theology hermeneutics) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
