<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trinitarian Theology for the Church: Vanhoozer Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/trinitarian-theology-for-the-church-vanhoozer-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/trinitarian-theology-for-the-church-vanhoozer-part-1/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Grow</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/trinitarian-theology-for-the-church-vanhoozer-part-1/#comment-11353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobby Grow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=2355#comment-11353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m looking forward to reading this book, Vanhoozer is always good!

I think his point on the typical framing of revelation in scripture as cognitive and thus deistic, is right on . . . if God is dynamic, then anything that would purport to be His revelation also needs to be framed and seen as dynamic. 

I would be interested to see how he incorporates the Incarnational analogy with his view of &quot;inspiration.&quot; Look forward to further posts on this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to reading this book, Vanhoozer is always good!</p>
<p>I think his point on the typical framing of revelation in scripture as cognitive and thus deistic, is right on . . . if God is dynamic, then anything that would purport to be His revelation also needs to be framed and seen as dynamic. </p>
<p>I would be interested to see how he incorporates the Incarnational analogy with his view of &#8220;inspiration.&#8221; Look forward to further posts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
