<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Divine Teaching: Part Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/divine-teaching-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/divine-teaching-part-two/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/divine-teaching-part-two/#comment-12676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=2503#comment-12676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffin</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/divine-teaching-part-two/#comment-12673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=2503#comment-12673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the test of good theology, is the kind of person it makes us into, that is more Biblical than one might have thought:  &quot;by their fruits you shall know them.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the test of good theology, is the kind of person it makes us into, that is more Biblical than one might have thought:  &#8220;by their fruits you shall know them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Grow</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/divine-teaching-part-two/#comment-12493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobby Grow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=2503#comment-12493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When he says:

&lt;em&gt;“What I’m suggesting, then, is a test for theological legitimacy and integrity that does not predetermine the forms of thought in which theologians venture out, but rather examines the kind of persons their theological journeys make of them” (50).&lt;/em&gt;

Sounds like he has &lt;em&gt;scholastic&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;negative&lt;/em&gt; theology in his cross-hairs, and rightly so! It also sounds like a clear indictment of &quot;Evangelical&quot; theology (in general).

I like what McIntosh has to say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When he says:</p>
<p><em>“What I’m suggesting, then, is a test for theological legitimacy and integrity that does not predetermine the forms of thought in which theologians venture out, but rather examines the kind of persons their theological journeys make of them” (50).</em></p>
<p>Sounds like he has <em>scholastic</em> <em>negative</em> theology in his cross-hairs, and rightly so! It also sounds like a clear indictment of &#8220;Evangelical&#8221; theology (in general).</p>
<p>I like what McIntosh has to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
