<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NT Wright on anonymous blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Cyberspace Evil? Thoughts Toward A Christian Ethic of Blogging &#124; When I Survey . . .</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-25747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Cyberspace Evil? Thoughts Toward A Christian Ethic of Blogging &#124; When I Survey . . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-25747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Tom Wright, someone I once briefly studied with thirty years ago and greatly respect, had rather pointedly addressed the issue in a recent book, from which an excerpt was posted on Theology Forum, a thoughtful theo-blog. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tom Wright, someone I once briefly studied with thirty years ago and greatly respect, had rather pointedly addressed the issue in a recent book, from which an excerpt was posted on Theology Forum, a thoughtful theo-blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Once more on anonymous blogging &#171; Theology Forum</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Once more on anonymous blogging &#171; Theology Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 17, 2010 by Kent Eilers    Our discussion of NT Wright&#8217;s comments on anonymous blogging came to mind as I was reading Graham [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 17, 2010 by Kent Eilers    Our discussion of NT Wright&#8217;s comments on anonymous blogging came to mind as I was reading Graham [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that would certainly be interesting to pursue (I think at least). How to take that forward is more than I can manage right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that would certainly be interesting to pursue (I think at least). How to take that forward is more than I can manage right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Scheer</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Scheer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the question to ask to that then would be, how in the world do we begin to critique &quot;undefined spatiality&quot;?  What about embodying some spatial realm and identity is intrinsic to Christian thought?  Certainly the incarnation offers some insight, but how do we begin to generate some Christian ethic of blogging and what normative sources or ideas do we use to justify our claims?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the question to ask to that then would be, how in the world do we begin to critique &#8220;undefined spatiality&#8221;?  What about embodying some spatial realm and identity is intrinsic to Christian thought?  Certainly the incarnation offers some insight, but how do we begin to generate some Christian ethic of blogging and what normative sources or ideas do we use to justify our claims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said Andy. Graham Ward has an interesting perspective on this in &lt;i&gt;The Postmodern God&lt;/i&gt; that I may bring up for some further discussion because I believe it relates. He suggests that cyberspace represents the postmodern medium in which 

&quot;Time and space as perceived by empiricists collapse into omnipresence and multilocality ... Cyberspace is an undefined spatiality, like the contours of a perfume, and you are an adventurer, a navigator in uncharted waters, discovering the hero inside yourself. You act anonymously, simply as the unnamed, unidentifiable viewpoint of so many interactive network games, and where an identity is needed, you construct one&quot; (xv).  

If he&#039;s right, then we would be wise to offer our critique of just such a displacement of located-ness, the locality intrinsic to finite creation. Don&#039;t you think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Andy. Graham Ward has an interesting perspective on this in <i>The Postmodern God</i> that I may bring up for some further discussion because I believe it relates. He suggests that cyberspace represents the postmodern medium in which </p>
<p>&#8220;Time and space as perceived by empiricists collapse into omnipresence and multilocality &#8230; Cyberspace is an undefined spatiality, like the contours of a perfume, and you are an adventurer, a navigator in uncharted waters, discovering the hero inside yourself. You act anonymously, simply as the unnamed, unidentifiable viewpoint of so many interactive network games, and where an identity is needed, you construct one&#8221; (xv).  </p>
<p>If he&#8217;s right, then we would be wise to offer our critique of just such a displacement of located-ness, the locality intrinsic to finite creation. Don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Scheer</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Scheer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been mulling over this the last couple of days trying to understand what Wright might have been suggesting with the &quot;couple of minutes&quot; idea and I think I certainly agree with Kent that Wright&#039;s attack is not against blogging, but anonymous blogging.  In some ways, like it or not, blogging has become the normative medium of discourse in our tech savvy society and I think Wright is certainly aware of this.  As a result I think Wrights concern (as I think everyone else has pretty much brought up) is with the anonymity in which we can escape into what has become the (dare I say it again) the normative medium of interaction nowadays.  I think the anonymity is a luxury that hasn&#039;t been afforded to theologians until now and perhaps Wright is concerned at what might become of that.

But to be clear, I&#039;d much rather be willing to meet ya&#039;ll in a pub and talk about Wright&#039;s ideas over a pint of stout.  It&#039;s certainly the ideal social environment eh? No pseudonyms in that arena.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been mulling over this the last couple of days trying to understand what Wright might have been suggesting with the &#8220;couple of minutes&#8221; idea and I think I certainly agree with Kent that Wright&#8217;s attack is not against blogging, but anonymous blogging.  In some ways, like it or not, blogging has become the normative medium of discourse in our tech savvy society and I think Wright is certainly aware of this.  As a result I think Wrights concern (as I think everyone else has pretty much brought up) is with the anonymity in which we can escape into what has become the (dare I say it again) the normative medium of interaction nowadays.  I think the anonymity is a luxury that hasn&#8217;t been afforded to theologians until now and perhaps Wright is concerned at what might become of that.</p>
<p>But to be clear, I&#8217;d much rather be willing to meet ya&#8217;ll in a pub and talk about Wright&#8217;s ideas over a pint of stout.  It&#8217;s certainly the ideal social environment eh? No pseudonyms in that arena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Betson</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Betson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Christians we need to be mindful of our speech, thoughts, and actions, anonymous or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Christians we need to be mindful of our speech, thoughts, and actions, anonymous or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven D</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think anything beyond a name and email ought be required.  Certainly not wanting your picture online should not count towards someone&#039;s being labeled a &#039;coward&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anything beyond a name and email ought be required.  Certainly not wanting your picture online should not count towards someone&#8217;s being labeled a &#8216;coward&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do miss seeing your smiling face.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do miss seeing your smiling face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geordie Ziegler</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/nt-wright-on-anonymous-blogging/#comment-17438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geordie Ziegler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3156#comment-17438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So now i have to go out and take a picture to attach to my name?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now i have to go out and take a picture to attach to my name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
