<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evagrius and the Persons and Essence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/evagrius-and-the-persons-and-essence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/evagrius-and-the-persons-and-essence/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polygrammaton</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/evagrius-and-the-persons-and-essence/#comment-22054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polygrammaton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 06:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3741#comment-22054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...the essential unity of God as one...&quot;

Anything that can be said about God can have referrence only to God&#039;s accidentals, for who can claim to know what divine essence is? As such, in its essence, deity is unknowable, undescribable, inscrutable, even unspeakable, and such properties as oneness, or manyness, or threeness cannot but be considered only as accidentals. If we want to speak out all the truth about the Uknowable, it can be said neither that it has anything to do with numbers, nor that it has nothing to do with them. And this principle partly agrees with the Church Fathers&#039; view that the Holy Trinity is uncountable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the essential unity of God as one&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Anything that can be said about God can have referrence only to God&#8217;s accidentals, for who can claim to know what divine essence is? As such, in its essence, deity is unknowable, undescribable, inscrutable, even unspeakable, and such properties as oneness, or manyness, or threeness cannot but be considered only as accidentals. If we want to speak out all the truth about the Uknowable, it can be said neither that it has anything to do with numbers, nor that it has nothing to do with them. And this principle partly agrees with the Church Fathers&#8217; view that the Holy Trinity is uncountable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torey</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/evagrius-and-the-persons-and-essence/#comment-21828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3741#comment-21828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Number is a property of quantity; and quantity is linked to bodily nature; therefore, number is a property of bodily nature&quot;Such truth in those words!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Number is a property of quantity; and quantity is linked to bodily nature; therefore, number is a property of bodily nature&#8221;Such truth in those words!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brettongarcia</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/evagrius-and-the-persons-and-essence/#comment-21825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brettongarcia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=3741#comment-21825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) If &quot;the son is no creature,&quot; then how is Jesus &quot;wholly God and wholly man&quot;?  

2) If number is only found in the natural realm, and not in the divine essence of God, then how can a number - Trinity - exist in God?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) If &#8220;the son is no creature,&#8221; then how is Jesus &#8220;wholly God and wholly man&#8221;?  </p>
<p>2) If number is only found in the natural realm, and not in the divine essence of God, then how can a number &#8211; Trinity &#8211; exist in God?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
