<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rome, Evangelicalism, and the Regulative Principle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/rome-evangelicalism-and-the-regulative-principle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/rome-evangelicalism-and-the-regulative-principle/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Duby</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/rome-evangelicalism-and-the-regulative-principle/#comment-24563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Duby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=4268#comment-24563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You mean life and ministry in Spain don&#039;t allow for unlimited leisure time?  =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean life and ministry in Spain don&#8217;t allow for unlimited leisure time?  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/rome-evangelicalism-and-the-regulative-principle/#comment-24562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=4268#comment-24562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Steve - I would enjoy going back and forth, but I unfortunately have neither the time nor the energy to do so at the moment. Life has hit the fan these past few days. As it is, I bet you could tease out your own rebuttal... :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve &#8211; I would enjoy going back and forth, but I unfortunately have neither the time nor the energy to do so at the moment. Life has hit the fan these past few days. As it is, I bet you could tease out your own rebuttal&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Duby</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/rome-evangelicalism-and-the-regulative-principle/#comment-24542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Duby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=4268#comment-24542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Ben,

Thanks for commenting here.  I imagine that, being in a cultural setting so different from the US, you guys are experiencing every Sunday the reality of how diversity among God&#039;s people yields diversity in worship services.  I wonder if Calvin could respond to your concerns by saying, for example, that the language and the melodies of Psalm-singing would be peculiar to each culture while the content remains the same.  He was, after all, already in his time engaged in cross-cultural considerations by trying to look at NT ecclesial practices and map out how to appropriate them centuries later and in places like Switzerland and France.  I suppose I&#039;m playing devil&#039;s advocate a bit and suggesting that congregations in diverse areas might be &#039;free&#039; in certain ways and yet abide by Calvin&#039;s theological principles, especially since freedom in worship by itself is a really pliable concept that invites filling out and requires some theological constraints.  If you&#039;ve got time, I&#039;d be curious to hear your response.

Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ben,</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting here.  I imagine that, being in a cultural setting so different from the US, you guys are experiencing every Sunday the reality of how diversity among God&#8217;s people yields diversity in worship services.  I wonder if Calvin could respond to your concerns by saying, for example, that the language and the melodies of Psalm-singing would be peculiar to each culture while the content remains the same.  He was, after all, already in his time engaged in cross-cultural considerations by trying to look at NT ecclesial practices and map out how to appropriate them centuries later and in places like Switzerland and France.  I suppose I&#8217;m playing devil&#8217;s advocate a bit and suggesting that congregations in diverse areas might be &#8216;free&#8217; in certain ways and yet abide by Calvin&#8217;s theological principles, especially since freedom in worship by itself is a really pliable concept that invites filling out and requires some theological constraints.  If you&#8217;ve got time, I&#8217;d be curious to hear your response.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brettongarcia</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/rome-evangelicalism-and-the-regulative-principle/#comment-24523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brettongarcia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=4268#comment-24523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone see in cheap bookstores, the now-remaindered theological book on A Religious Argument Against Belief?  The point seemed to be that religion should always essentially be about mystery, openness; whereas fixed &quot;belief&quot; contradicts that essential quality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone see in cheap bookstores, the now-remaindered theological book on A Religious Argument Against Belief?  The point seemed to be that religion should always essentially be about mystery, openness; whereas fixed &#8220;belief&#8221; contradicts that essential quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/rome-evangelicalism-and-the-regulative-principle/#comment-24520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=4268#comment-24520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I see it, the regulative principle swings the pendulum too far away from Roman Catholicism, and it swings it in the wrong direction. If Roman Catholic worship in the sixteenth century was elaborate and fixed, Calvin made it simple and fixed. Elaborate or simple, it&#039;s the fixed part that needs fixing. We are free in Christ to worship the One True God in whatever way best responds to the interaction of God and humanity in our local context. In a way, this extends the incarnation. This is one of the reasons I&#039;m low church - not that I prefer low liturgy to high liturgy, but that I do not believe there is one correct liturgy. In this way the medieval RC church, Calvin, the Orthodox church, and various perspectives within the evangelical &quot;worship wars&quot; all make the same mistake: telling liturgy to fit into a certain box.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I see it, the regulative principle swings the pendulum too far away from Roman Catholicism, and it swings it in the wrong direction. If Roman Catholic worship in the sixteenth century was elaborate and fixed, Calvin made it simple and fixed. Elaborate or simple, it&#8217;s the fixed part that needs fixing. We are free in Christ to worship the One True God in whatever way best responds to the interaction of God and humanity in our local context. In a way, this extends the incarnation. This is one of the reasons I&#8217;m low church &#8211; not that I prefer low liturgy to high liturgy, but that I do not believe there is one correct liturgy. In this way the medieval RC church, Calvin, the Orthodox church, and various perspectives within the evangelical &#8220;worship wars&#8221; all make the same mistake: telling liturgy to fit into a certain box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
