<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rejected! &#8211; The unhappy job of peer review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/rejected-the-unhappy-job-of-peer-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/rejected-the-unhappy-job-of-peer-review/</link>
	<description>Serving the joyful cultivation of the theological craft for the life of the church: inquiring honestly, deliberating wisely, acting faithfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Eilers</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/rejected-the-unhappy-job-of-peer-review/#comment-26068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Eilers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=4725#comment-26068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for commiserating Mike. When my essay was rejected last year I was frustrated because the reviewers offered no substantive feedback. We are all busy, I certainly understand that, but an agreement to peer review entails the responsibility to provide useful feedback when an essay is declined.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commiserating Mike. When my essay was rejected last year I was frustrated because the reviewers offered no substantive feedback. We are all busy, I certainly understand that, but an agreement to peer review entails the responsibility to provide useful feedback when an essay is declined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mykh</title>
		<link>http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/rejected-the-unhappy-job-of-peer-review/#comment-26063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mykh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyforum.wordpress.com/?p=4725#comment-26063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kent, I have been on both sides of this fence, many times. I have had scores of essays (well a few) rejected by journals, sadly. In a few cases I totally agreed with the reviewers comments and they helped me sharpen my argument and writing, it was a positive experience and the articles were subsequently published. In other cases the reviewers comments were either non-existent (thanks publishers - that is helpful!), or they were unhelpful, on the level of “well I don’t agree with that argument so I don’t recommend it be published.” Who cares if you don’t agree with it! I also peer review for a number of journals and have had to decline some. It is always disappointing and I try to write very constructive comments on why it was rejected and what it may need to do to bring it up to scratch. In one case I think I had one like you are talking about and it was so bad I offered very little comment as nothing could save it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kent, I have been on both sides of this fence, many times. I have had scores of essays (well a few) rejected by journals, sadly. In a few cases I totally agreed with the reviewers comments and they helped me sharpen my argument and writing, it was a positive experience and the articles were subsequently published. In other cases the reviewers comments were either non-existent (thanks publishers &#8211; that is helpful!), or they were unhelpful, on the level of “well I don’t agree with that argument so I don’t recommend it be published.” Who cares if you don’t agree with it! I also peer review for a number of journals and have had to decline some. It is always disappointing and I try to write very constructive comments on why it was rejected and what it may need to do to bring it up to scratch. In one case I think I had one like you are talking about and it was so bad I offered very little comment as nothing could save it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
